Category Archives: Spirit of vatican 2

Modernist propaganda used by the synod Cardinals


Recently the Catholic News Service has released a video titled: Pope Francis’ family mission. Correct me if I’m wrong, but if you pay close attention you can detect that it is filled with nothing but modernist propaganda.

How so? While watching it you will notice that there is a huge emphasis upon world disasters, “pastoral solutions” to respond to the crises on the family, and even “a new tone” as Cardinal Dolan puts it.

Not only that, in the middle of the 20 minute video a young adult male mentions how he, as a homosexual, was in fear of making known his sexual orientation since he knew that his father would most likely kick him out of his home due to his objection to homosexual unions. Subjectively speaking; this is most likely why the modernist bishops were the only ones featured in the video in the first place. My only question is this, why weren’t the Conservative bishops featured? Why were modernist heretics such as Wuelr, Dolan, Kasper etc. the only ones speaking? I mean its not like they don’t object dogma, right? If the only topic at the synod was to address the crises on the family due to divorce and remarriage, then why was homosexuality brought up to begin with? Is it because they desire to slowly change dogma, which is impossible?

      – Jimmy Papist Moment ahead –

Oh come on, TAB, I think you’re overreacting! I mean, Kasper is faithful to Tradition after all. Right? Hahaha

And the sarcasm begins…


Leave a comment

Filed under Heresy, Heretics, Homosexual so called marriage, Homosexuality, Spirit of vatican 2, vatican ii

The USCCB and the “insults” upon Father Barron. 

 So the USCCB rejected to respond to my concerns. What concerns you might say? Well.. The very fact that Father Barron, the priest who believes that Hell is almost empty and that nobody really goes there, is being appointed a Bishop. I simply asked how does one  who rejects dogma: – therefore a heretic – get the pass and the right to become a ordained Shepard of the Church? Wouldn’t this harm souls? I think so. Even though they removed my previous comments, take a look at the conversation below in which a remnant remained upon the page until I was banned. 



Wait for it.. Wait for it.. (Banned from speaking further). 


The Catechism of Trent states: These abodes are not all of the same nature, for among them is that most loathsome and dark prison in which the souls of the damned are tormented with the unclean spirits in eternal and inextinguishable fire. This place is called gehenna, the bottomless pit, and is hell strictly so-called.” 

What I do not get is how those within the Concilliar hierarchy always emphasize upon a “new evangelization” that was called for by Pope John Paul II, yet In his 1994 book, ‘Crossing the Threshold of Hope’, Pope John Paul II wrote that too often “preachers, catechists, teachers no longer have the courage to preach the threat of hell” (p. 183). 

If our job as Catholics isn’t to preach the Gospel to all nations so we can announce the truth for their salvation and give them the sacraments, then what is it, Barron & USCCB?  Even the new Catechism states:

“”The teaching of the Church affirms the existence of hell and its eternity. Immediately after death the souls of those who die in a state of mortal sin descend into hell, where they suffer the punishments of hell, ‘eternal fire.’ The chief punishment of hell is eternal separation from God, in whom alone man can possess the life and happiness for which he was created and for which he longs” (1035).

1 Comment

Filed under Hell, Heresy, modernism, Quotes, Repent, Salvation, Sin, Spirit of vatican 2, USCCB, vatican ii

It’s traditional to have a Globe Mass? 

A friend of mine was recently told about a Catholic middle school that is supposedly “Traditionalist”. After doing investigation she found rather the contrary. 


Is it because they do not have Altar girls that it’s supposedly Traditional? Is it because of the Cassock and Surplice that the altar boys are vested with? I mean the black and white neon stations of the Cross do help with devotion to the Passion after all. This is a pure embarrassment.

 – Jimmy Papist Moment –

“Ooo, ooo, I’m sure they used this song for their heretical liturgy!” Link

I wouldn’t doubt it, little buddy, I wouldn’t doubt it at all.

Source:St.Joseph School Gallery

Leave a comment

Filed under Blasphemy, Heresy, liturgical abuse, Spirit of vatican 2, vatican ii

Oh now isn’t that cute, Father? 

This is going to lead to loads of hate mail from the Neo cons and other life queen, neocat, and youcat supports; but oh well. If you call this “reverence” then it just proves how deceived you are. Guess who else was laughing and dancing at Calvery? The Romans who mocked Christ as King. 

Leave a comment

Filed under Life teen, liturgical abuse, liturgy, modernism, Novus Ordo, Spirit of vatican 2, vatican ii

Blasphemy of North American Priest: Father Federico Loos

What you are about to read contains material that includes blasphemy and foul language as a result of the actions this priest has committed. If you have a weak stomach and cannot handle the position of a apostate, leave now. For those of you who are brave enough to even dare read the research I have done on this priest personally, remember to say a rosary for him, for he should have never taken the path that he has took. Not only did his actions deceive and hurt the sheep of Christ, but it also blasphemed Our Lord and the holy gospels, which is something that will put you in hell in the blink of an eye if one does not repent of mortal sin and dies in that state.

My dear brothers and sisters in Christ, meet North American priest Father Federico Loos, or as the young Mexican gang bangers called him “The priest of gang bangers”.


It was in the beginning of 1987 that this priest has went to the town of Naucalpan, Mexico with the goal of bringing “god’ to the youth that were active in gang violence, however, his mission failed due to the corrupt procedures he has taken and even considers laughable in addition to the blasphemy and sacrilege that he has committed, as proven in his recent interview.
In addition to gathering the gang members of the area; he felt the calling to not only re write the gospels, but to rewrite them in such a fashion that you cannot disguise if you are reading the word of God or a every day secularist magazine. A quote from his “chapter of the gospel with gang rhythms” that he claims helps the juvenile delinquents relate to the gospel states as follows:

“Things are falling apart, Jesus. Explain to us dude why your dad, Woody, has been with so many ladies? And now he has about 25 kids. Is it fine for somebody to behave like that? How is it going to be fine, Jesus said: man is not a dog, and shouldn’t fu*k every woman who is willing. Be careful, don’t ruin what the Main Chief has created”.

Did anybody catch that? God the Father now has many wives? Since when did Our Lord submit to the false prophet, Joseph Smith, who founded the mormon cult? Not only did he distort the gospel with such blasphemy, heresy, and idiocy, but he has also given God the Father a new name, Main Chief, which is how the members of a gang would identify who is the head of the gang.
This priest gives reference to the blasphemy he has committed because he states “This is the way they talk” as in, this is the way the gang bangers would supposedly understand the gospels. This is outright absurd.

The “Church service” of Father Loos (er)

Since this priest would hold regular “church services” to reconcile the gangs, at mass the youth would chant “Oh my Father, have mercy!” however, this did not please Father Loos since he himself mocked this practice and states that  “They haven’t changed! What young kid is going to relate to that Gospel?!” It makes you wonder if this man had the desire to save souls, but from what are seeing here, this is not the case since he himself also stated that on the feast of Saint Jude ” we organized the burning of small figurines” (the statues of Saint Jude since the custom is to carry a statue or another sacramental in relation to devotion to this Holy Apostle of Christ). Pure iconoclasm, a heresy condemned by the second council of Nicea in 787 A.D.

How I feel bad for the souls he has deceived, for he has not only re written the gospels as I stated above, but also the confiteor with the following:
“Help us against all these sins and from all of these fuc*ing problems! Save us lord!” … Anathema!
This is what happens when you try to have the church “get with the times”. Not only do you include heretical and blasphemous prayers in the liturgy that are worthy of interdict and give communion to non catholics (which is a mortal sin), but you also put a new image on God by trying to depict him as a gang member, as this priest calls the image “Christ of gangs” as if this is some approved apparition or devotion, which it will never be in Holy Mother Church. Please remember to say a prayer for this priest for the souls that he has deceived through his irrelevant behavior. This is the exact evidence and result of priestly formation in the liberal seminaries that educate seminarians in the “spirit of Vatican II”. Lord, have mercy on those who abuse your mercy, mock your justice, and reject your truth. Through the intercession of all of your saints, spare his soul and may he die in sanctifying grace. Amen.
Sacrilegious Communion (I wonder if he even used the words of consecration without adding lyrics from a song of AC/DC)

Sacrilegious Communion (I wonder if he even used the words of consecration without adding lyrics from a song of AC/DC)

Leave a comment

Filed under Apostasy, Blasphemy, modernism, Spirit of vatican 2

Michelle Arnold and liturgical disaster.


On December 15, 2015; Michelle Arnold, a staff member at Catholic Answers, has stated something on the Catholic Answers blog post “A mess a mass” something I found to be absolutely disturbing. She has stated the following:

“So, what is the common bond between these two questions? I believe the problem is that many Catholics seem to think that the Eucharistic liturgy must be presented perfectly, as if it was a Broadway show, or even as if it was a military drill. Anything that appears to deviate in the slightest from the rubrics of the Mass is considered schmaltzy at best, and sinful at worst. The common cry becomes “Why can’t priests just say the black and do the red?” (Meaning, pray the prayers of the liturgy printed in the black type, and perform the actions of the liturgy printed in red type.)

Uh oh! I think she’s challenging you, Father Z.. Continuing.. 

“But the sacramentary is not and was never intended to be a cookbook.”

Is she suggesting that the liturgy must give flexibility to liturgical disaster that we have seen since the innovative and fallible Second Vatican Council? I mean, dancing in the isles and holding hands during the Our Father is Catholic and in line with Tradition after all, right? Lets be realistic here, this is a pure absurd modernist argument. It was because of statements like these that masonic behavior crept into the Liturgy of the Church in which replaced Tradition, including the removal of the True Roman Mass for that matter.

This is why Pope Benedict XVI himself stated that “the crises we see in society today can be linked to problems of the liturgy.” For Mrs. Michelle Arnold to state that the “liturgy was never intended to be a cook book” is to also say that new practices can be initiated into the liturgy; which is something even Vatican II prohibited in (Sacrosanctum Concilium, n.22 §3) that “no one, not even a priest, may on his own add, remove, or change anything in the liturgy”. 

My only question for her is this; does session 7 of Canon 13 from the Council of Trent still apply? Or does the infallible Council of Catholic Answers now suggest that we must liberalize the liturgy, therefore anathematizing Pope Pius X for condemning the evolution of Dogma and worship when he stated “To the laws of evolution everything is subject under penalty of death — dogma, Church, worship, the Books we revere as sacred, even faith itself.” Note that the books that the church reveres as sacred is the Missal of the Mass itself.

Trent Session 7 Canon 13: “If any one saith, that the received and approved rites of the Catholic Church, wont to be used in the solemn administration of the sacraments, may be contemned, or without sin be omitted at pleasure by the ministers, or be changed, by every pastor of the churches, into other new ones; let him be anathema.”

It’s that clear, Mrs. Arnold, so where are you getting your sources? Nuns on the bus? Salt and Light TV? Jimmy Akin? Give me a break. What’s even more absurd is her next statement..

“When we attend Mass and see that others are not acting according to our expectations, there is a danger that we can judge them unfairly. For example, if the parish decides to host a Christmas pageant (whether or not a eucharistic liturgy will also occur as part of the planned program) there is a temptation to dismiss it as “cutesy” and “warm and fuzzy.”

Is that not the intention, Mrs. Arnold, when children dress up in costumes to perform a play? I mean, this does belong in the liturgy after all, right?

Leave a comment

Filed under liturgy, modernism, Spirit of vatican 2

Video: Michael Davies – Religious Liberty and the state

Leave a comment

Filed under Catholic Truth, Christ reigns forever, Freemasons, Heresy, Spirit of vatican 2, vatican ii

My commentary on the recent encyclical of Pope Francis

After reading the encyclical titled  ‘Laudato SI’  that was recently released, I found many statements within the document to be quite questionable.

I honestly believe along with Catholic journalist, Michael Matt from ‘The Remnant’, that our Holy Father, Pope Francis, is possibly under control from enemies of the Church within the UN as he stated Here, although I would also argue that the masons are just as much responsible, however, that’s a topic for another day. The disturbing quotations from the encyclical, along with my commentary, list as follows:

  • Section 63: Respect must also be shown for the various cultural riches of different peoples, their art and poetry, their interior life and spirituality. If we are truly concerned to develop an ecology capable of remedying the damage we have done, no branch of the sciences and no form of wisdom can be left out, and that includes religion and the language particular to it. The Catholic Church is open to dialogue with philosophical thought; this has enabled her to produce various syntheses between faith and reason. The development of the Church’s social teaching represents such a synthesis with regard to social issues; this teaching is called to be enriched by taking up new challenges.

Excuse me if I am misinterpreting this, but is our beloved Pope suggesting that we respect the false religions of various nations such as Buddhism, modern Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, and Wicca that reject the basic dogmas of the Holy Catholic faith? Are we to respect pagan religions that worship deities of the underworld such as Buddhism, Hinduism, and Wicca that outright blaspheme our Lord? Respect for the individual human being is one thing since we are to respect the dignity of each and every single person since we are all made in the image of God, however, respecting a religion that flat out rejects Christ whom is the way, truth, and the life is objectively speaking border line apostasy since it can initiate indifferentism as we have seen at Assisi under the authority of Pope John Paul II, which later resulted in Buddhist worship within a Catholic chapel of Assisi along with placing a statue of the false prophet Buddha above the Tabernacle in which Our Lord was present.

Buddhists bowing to statue of the false prophet Buddha that was placed above the tabernacle within Saint Peter’s Chapel in Assissi, 1986

Are we not, by the virtue of our baptism, obliged to share the Gospel with those in false religions so that we can lead them to the truth for the salvation of their souls? Was not indifferentism previously condemned by the Church in Her 2000 years of tradition and the infallible councils? What about the encyclical of Pope Gregory the 15th titled ‘Mirari Vos’ that was released on August 15,1832 which states the following:

“Now We consider another abundant source of the evils with which the Church is afflicted at present: indifferentism. This perverse opinion is spread on all sides by the fraud of the wicked who claim that it is possible to obtain the eternal salvation of the soul by the profession of any kind of religion, as long as morality is maintained. Surely, in so clear a matter, you will drive this deadly error far from the people committed to your care. With the admonition of the apostle that “there is one God, one faith, one baptism”may those fear who contrive the notion that the safe harbor of salvation is open to persons of any religion whatever. They should consider the testimony of Christ Himself that “those who are not with Christ are against Him,” and that they disperse unhappily who do not gather with Him. Therefore “without a doubt, they will perish forever, unless they hold the Catholic faith whole and inviolate.” Let them hear Jerome who, while the Church was torn into three parts by schism, tells us that whenever someone tried to persuade him to join his group he always exclaimed: “He who is for the See of Peter is for me.”A schismatic flatters himself falsely if he asserts that he, too, has been washed in the waters of regeneration. Indeed Augustine would reply to such a man: “The branch has the same form when it has been cut off from the vine; but of what profit for it is the form, if it does not live from the root?”

  • Section 64. “Furthermore, although this Encyclical welcomes dialogue with everyone so that together we can seek paths of liberation, I would like from the outset to show how faith convictions can offer Christians, and some other believers as well, ample motivation to care for nature and for the most vulnerable of their brothers and sisters. If the simple fact of being human moves people to care for the environment of which they are a part, Christians in their turn “realize that their responsibility within creation, and their duty towards nature and the Creator, are an essential part of their faith”. It is good for humanity and the world at large when we believers better recognize the ecological commitments which stem from our convictions.”

The reason I find this to be quite questionable is because it seems that our beloved Pope intends to promote flexibility of theology and ideas from those outside of the Church in regards to how we solve the issues we are now facing in the world, thus “dialogue with everyone so that together we can seek paths of liberation”. Continuing..

  • Section 67: “Although it is true that we Christians have at times incorrectly interpreted the Scriptures, nowadays we must forcefully reject the notion that our being created in God’s image and given dominion over the earth justifies absolute domination over other creatures.”

While it is true that those who identify as Christians have misinterpreted scripture, is the Holy Father also suggesting that the Church has misinterpreted scripture these past 2000 years, especially when it comes to the “symbolic and narrative language” as stated in section 66? Continuing..

  • Section 216: The rich heritage of Christian spirituality, the fruit of twenty centuries of personal and communal experience, has a precious contribution to make to the renewal of humanity. Here, I would like to offer Christians a few suggestions for an ecological spirituality grounded in the convictions of our faith, since the teachings of the Gospel have direct consequences for our way of thinking, feeling and living. More than in ideas or concepts as such, I am interested in how such a spirituality can motivate us to a more passionate concern for the protection of our world. A commitment this lofty cannot be sustained by doctrine alone, without a spirituality capable of inspiring us, without an “interior impulse which encourages, motivates, nourishes and gives meaning to our individual and communal activity”.

Is neo pagan ecological spirituality now bound upon the faithful, Holy Father since section 15 states “It is my hope that this Encyclical Letter, which is now added to the body of the Church’s social teaching, can help us to acknowledge the appeal, immensity and urgency of the challenge we face”? Wouldn’t this be apostasy?

  • Section 222: “Christian spirituality proposes an alternative understanding of the quality of life, and encourages a prophetic and contemplative lifestyle, one capable of deep enjoyment free of the obsession with consumption. We need to take up an ancient lesson, found in different religious traditions and also in the Bible.”

This quotation explains itself clearly.. This is blasphemy and heresy. Suggesting that we take up ancient lessons of false religions, such as the Quran which outright rejects the Blessed Trinity, Baptism, the Divinity of Our Lord, Jesus Christ etc. – is something the Saints of the Church would condemn.

Any cult which denies the divinity of Christ, does not profess the existence of the Holy Trinity, refutes baptism, defames Christians, and derogates the priesthood, we consider to be damned.” -Sts. Aurelius, Felix, George, Liliosa, and Natalia (d. 852), martyrs of Cordoba, Spain. Reported in the Memoriale Sanctorum in response to Spanish Umayyad Caliph ‘Abd Ar-Rahman II’s ministers that they convert to Islam on pain of death.

  • 236: “Indeed the Eucharist is itself an act of cosmic love: “Yes, cosmic! Because even when it is celebrated on the humble altar of a country church, the Eucharist is always in some way celebrated on the altar of the world”.

What is this altar of the world if the prince of this world is satan?..

  • Section 246: At the conclusion of this lengthy reflection which has been both joyful and troubling, I propose that we offer two prayers. The first we can share with all who believe in a God who is the all-powerful Creator, while in the other we Christians ask for inspiration to take up the commitment to creation set before us by the Gospel of Jesus.

Holy Father, are we to pray with those who do not accept the basic Christian faith? Are we to pray with pagans who worship demons, muslims and jews who reject the messiah, and heretics who reject the Catholic faith? What about Pope Saint. Agatho I, your successor, whom stated “If anyone prays with heretics, he is a heretic” which he stated in the 7th century? Is this now out dated theology, thus Church teachings can develop and change along with Dogma that was condemned by Pope Pius X, or is this still the case?
Continue to pray for the Holy Father, my fellow crusaders. 

Leave a comment

Filed under Encyclical, modernism, Pope Francis, Spirit of vatican 2, vatican ii

Saint Thomas Aquinas refuses the idea of EMHC 

  After reading The Summa of Saint Thomas Aquinas, a doctor of the Church, upon the topic of the Eucharist on this feast of Corpus Christi I found some statements in which he outright rejects the idea of laymen distributing Holy Communion. Let’s examine them, shall we? 

• “Only the ordained priest can change bread and wine into the Body and Blood of Christ in the name of Christ. Ordinarily, too, only the ordained priest can dispense this sacrament to the people in communion. The priest does what Christ did at the Last Supper. Christ consecrated bread and wine. He distributed His Body and Blood to His Apostles. The Priest consecrates bread and wine and distributes it to the people.”

• The Eucharist is God’s gift to the people. Again, the Eucharist is a sacred thing. It can be touched only by consecrated or sacred things. The linen cloth – the corporal, on which the Body of Christ rests on the Altar, the Chalice in which the Blood of Christ rests are consecrated for this purpose. So too, the hands of the priests are blessed and consecrated so that they may handle this sacrament worthily”.

• The priest consecrates bread and wine in the Sacrifice of the Mass. But whoever offers sacrifice must share in the sacrifice. The outward sacrifice is a sign of the inner by which he offers himself to God. By sharing in the external sacrifice he shows that he is making the internal sacrifice. For this reason, the priest who celebrates Mass must receive the Eucharist in communion at the Mass. Moreover, he dispenses this sacrament to others in communion. He himself out to receive first. In this way, he proves to the people that he is the dispenser of divine gifts”. 

This is what I have been saying all along. Our Lord deserves respect in the Blessed Sacrament and must be shown reverence. Pope Pius V, Pray for us.


Leave a comment

Filed under Extraordinary ministers, liturgical abuse, liturgy, modernism, Saint Thomas Aquinas, Spirit of vatican 2