Category Archives: Homosexuality

Modernist propaganda used by the synod Cardinals

  

Recently the Catholic News Service has released a video titled: Pope Francis’ family mission. Correct me if I’m wrong, but if you pay close attention you can detect that it is filled with nothing but modernist propaganda.

How so? While watching it you will notice that there is a huge emphasis upon world disasters, “pastoral solutions” to respond to the crises on the family, and even “a new tone” as Cardinal Dolan puts it.

Not only that, in the middle of the 20 minute video a young adult male mentions how he, as a homosexual, was in fear of making known his sexual orientation since he knew that his father would most likely kick him out of his home due to his objection to homosexual unions. Subjectively speaking; this is most likely why the modernist bishops were the only ones featured in the video in the first place. My only question is this, why weren’t the Conservative bishops featured? Why were modernist heretics such as Wuelr, Dolan, Kasper etc. the only ones speaking? I mean its not like they don’t object dogma, right? If the only topic at the synod was to address the crises on the family due to divorce and remarriage, then why was homosexuality brought up to begin with? Is it because they desire to slowly change dogma, which is impossible?

      – Jimmy Papist Moment ahead –

Oh come on, TAB, I think you’re overreacting! I mean, Kasper is faithful to Tradition after all. Right? Hahaha

And the sarcasm begins…

Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under Heresy, Heretics, Homosexual so called marriage, Homosexuality, Spirit of vatican 2, vatican ii

One of the many reasons why the Episcopal Church is a false religion: Gay “Marriage”

   

The following is taken from the article “Episcopalians vote to allow gay marriage in churches” The words in italic will be my commentary.

“Robinson, now retired, said he is breathless about how quickly the gay rights movement has progressed since he was getting daily death threats and forced to wear a bulletproof vest to his consecration 12 years ago.  (Talk about ‘bigotry’)

Episcopalians are set to vote Wednesday, July 1, 2015, on allowing religious weddings for same-sex couples, just days after the U.S. Supreme Court legalized gay marriage nationwide”. 

SALT LAKE CITY (AP) — Episcopalians overwhelmingly voted Wednesday to allow religious weddings for same-sex couples, solidifying the church’s embrace of gay rights that began more than a decade ago with the pioneering election of the first openly gay bishop.

The vote came in Salt Lake City at the Episcopal General Convention, just days after the U.S. Supreme Court legalized gay marriage nationwide. It passed in the House of Deputies, the voting body of clergy and lay participants at the meeting. The House of Bishops had approved the resolution Tuesday by 129-26 with five abstaining.

Prior to the vote, the Very Rev. Brian Baker of Sacramento said the church rule change was the result of a nearly four-decade long conversation that has been difficult and painful for many. Baker, chair of the committee that crafted the changes, said church members have not always been kind to one another but that the dynamic has changed in recent decades. 

(Oh boo hoo, does doctrine now base itself off emotions?)

“We have learned to not only care for, but care about one other,” Baker said. “That mutual care was present in the conversations we had. Some people disagreed, some people disagreed deeply, but we prayed and we listened and we came up with compromises that we believe make room and leave no one behind.”

Baker said the denomination’s House of Bishops prayed and debated the issue for five hours earlier this week before passing it on to the House of Deputies.

The new rule eliminates gender-specific language from church laws on marriage so that same-sex couples could have religious weddings. Instead of “husband” and “wife,” for example, the new church law will refer to “the couple.

  (I guess our Lord was too genderly descriptive when he ordered that marriage is between a male and a female alone..). 

Under the new rules, clergy can decline to perform the ceremonies. Many dioceses in the New York-based church of nearly 1.9 million members have allowed their priests to perform civil same-sex weddings, using a trial prayer service to bless the couple.

(And to who were these ‘priests’ praying to? Defiantly not God since this is pure blasphemy!). 

Still, the church hadn’t changed its own laws on marriage until Wednesday.The Episcopal Church joins two other mainline Protestant groups that allow gay marriage in all their congregations: the United Church of Christ and the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.). The 3.8-million-member Evangelical Lutheran Church in America lets its congregations decide for themselves, and many of them host gay weddings. 

(Haha, talk about the Church being the whore of Babylon when Luther’s own sect, along with the many other Protestant groups that flip flop doctrine, justify such immoral behavior that is against God’s Divine Law..)

The United Methodist Church, by far the largest mainline Protestant church with 12.8 million members, bars gay marriage, although many of its clergy have been officiating at same-sex weddings recently in protest.

The Episcopal Church is the U.S. wing of the Anglican Communion, an 80 million-member global fellowship of churches. Ties among Anglicans have been strained since Episcopalians in 2003 elected Bishop Gene Robinson, who lived openly with his male partner, to lead the Diocese of New Hampshire.

On the eve of the U.S. vote, Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby, spiritual leader of the world’s Anglicans, issued a statement expressing deep concern about the move to change the definition of marriage.

Faith groups across the spectrum of belief, from the Episcopal Church to the Southern Baptists, have been losing members as more Americans say they identify with no particular religion. The Episcopal Church has shrunk 18 percent over the last decade, after more than a generation of steady decline.

(This is what happens when one decides to change truth in order to “get with the times”).

After the Supreme Court ruling last week, many conservative churches, including the Southern Baptists and the Mormons, renewed their opposition to gay marriage.

The gay marriage decision is the second major news to come from the convention, the top policymaking body of the church. The church elected its first black presiding bishop last weekend, with Bishop Michael Curry of North Carolina winning in a landslide.

Curry has allowed same-sex church weddings in North Carolina, and he said the Supreme Court “affirmed the authenticity of love” (*cough cough* lust..) by legalizing gay marriage.

Source:Link

Leave a comment

Filed under Heresy, Homosexuality, modernism, Sin

Homosexuality and Morris M vs the Early Church Fathers

 
 In today’s society not only is the heresy of Sola scriptura embraced within Protestant circles, but we are now seeing it among the sodomite LGBT communities. From Genesis 2:24 and Ruth 1:14 in which “Ruth loved Noami as Adam loved Eve” (supposedly supporting same sex relationships), to 2 Samuel 1:26 “David loving Jonathan more than women”, to Matthew 19:10-12 supposedly saying that Jesus spoke of gays being born the way they are; these are all false interpretations and therefore, heretical. Since scripture, in which is inspired by the Holy Ghost, instructs that marriage is between a man and a woman alone (Genesis 1:27-28, Genesis 2:24, Ephesians 5:23,24,32, Matthew 19:4-6 etc) how can we conclude with some erroneous and blasphemous opinions in which suggest that God can supposedly change His mind and Will or contradict Himself as if He were imperfect, therefore a mortal and not a Supreme Being? 

The Homosexual supporters, such as Mr. Morris M, would also comment upon the story of Sodom and Gomorrah with absurd statements as the following:

“The story of Sodom and Gomorrah has been used to justify homophobia for centuries… it’s brought up anytime someone mentions gay rights as way of showing just how much God hates homosexuals. Too bad then that other parts of the Bible specifically state the Sodomites were firebombed for being arrogant rich windbags who hated the poor. God never actually states why he’s blowing up thousands of people; but the last act of the Sodomites before their fiery death is to try and rape three male angels, so the assumption is that homosexuality is the trigger. At least, it is if you’ve never bothered to read the rest of the Bible”. Source: Link

Since interpretation of scripture is becoming a issue with not only Protestants, but LGBT supporters, let us turn to the commentary of the Early Church Fathers, whom were disciples of the apostles, upon this key issue in which the bible supposedly does not touch upon the sin of sodomacy. In fact,let’s initiate the statements of the Early Church Fathers with scripture itself. 

Jude 1: 7: “Just as Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding cities, which likewise acted immorally and indulged in unnatural lust, serve as an example by undergoing a punishment of eternal fire”

 Pope Saint Gregory the Great, a early church father and doctor of the Church, repeats this in his own writings which state the following: 

“Sacred Scripture itself confirms that sulfur evokes the stench of the flesh, as it speaks of the rain of fire and sulfur poured upon Sodom by the Lord. He had decided to punish Sodom for the crimes of the flesh, and the very type of punishment he chose emphasized the shame of that crime. For sulfur stinks, and fire burns. So it was just that Sodomites, burning with perverse desires arising from the flesh like stench, should perish by fire and sulfur so that through this just punishment they would realize the evil they had committed, led by a perverse desire.” 

If Morris M was right upon his statement in which he said “other parts of the Bible specifically state the Sodomites were firebombed for being arrogant rich windbags who hated the poor.” then he must explain why Jude 1:7 argues otherwise when it states “immorally and indulged in unnatural lust, serve as an example by undergoing a punishment of eternal fire” as Saint Gregory simply repeated.Could it be that he is falling into the trap of hypocrisy in which he himself states “At least, it is if you’ve never bothered to read the rest of the Bible”. I would assume this is the case or he is being totally dishonest. 

He must argue why St. John Chrysostom, (347 – 407) whom was the greatest of the Greek Fathers (the original bible was written in Greek) a proclaimed Doctor of the Church, Archbishop and Patriarch of Constantinople was wrong when he, a expert on scripture and the doctrine of the apostles, stated the following: 
“Consider how great is that sin, to have forced hell to appear even before its time!… For that rain was unwonted, for the intercourse was contrary to nature, and it deluged the land, since lust had done so with their souls. Wherefore also the rain was the opposite of the customary rain. Now not only did it fail to stir up the womb of the earth to the production of fruits, but made it even useless for the reception of seed. For such was also the intercourse of the men, making a body of this sort more worthless than the very land of Sodom. And what is there more detestable than a man who hath pandered himself, or what more execrable?”

Could it be that the Holy Ghost in which Inspired the infallible scriptures and the Church was wrong all along? Could it be that the Holy Ghost failed the Church these past 2000 years until the infallible Mr.Morris came to be? We know the answer here and objectively speaking this is not the case. 

Saint Augustine – “Those offences which be contrary to nature are everywhere and at all times to be held in detestation and punished; such were those of the Sodomites, which should all nations commit, they should all be held guilty of the same crime by the divine law, which hath not so made men that they should in that way abuse one another. For even that fellowship which should be between God and us is violated, when that same nature of which He is author is polluted by the perversity of lust.”

Eusebius Pamphili (260 – 341), Bishop of Cæsarea in Palestine and the “Father of Church History,” writes in his book, Demonstratio Evangelica: 

“[God in the Law given to Moses] having forbidden all unlawful marriage, and all unseemly practice, and the union of women with women and men with men.”

Therefore, how can we say that Homosexuality is justified by God when it contradicts His own instructions and doctrine given to the infallible Church? Mr.Morris must either admit that he was wrong and dishonest or explain why his man made heathen doctrine is infallible and above God’s instructions. Since this is impossible, we can conclude that false interpretations of scripture are still in effect, even by non Christians, as the infidel Mr.Morris.

Leave a comment

Filed under Bible, Early church fathers, Heresy, Homosexuality, modernism, Sola scriptura