Category Archives: Encyclical

False religion, religious liberty, Islam, and Catholic combat. 

Blessed First Friday my dear brothers and sisters in Christ. It has been a month since I have posted since it’s very important to give time to God and the duties He gives you in life. I want to thank everyone for their prayers and support. 

Now let’s cut to the chase. While I was gone we have witnessed chaotic events that have taken place in this world corrupted by sin. From heresy coming from the Hiearchy of Holy Mother Church, to the shootings that slaughtered innocent people, to the construction of satanic temples here in the USA, I would like to emphasize the bombings in Paris from those who practice the demonicly inspired religion of Islam founded by the false prophet Mohammad. 

From what I recall, 60 lives were taken as a result of Islamic attacks upon innocent people. These attacks are done to give praise to the false god “allah” (not to be mistaken with the true Allah, The Blessed Trinity, since Allah translates to God in Arabic, hence the Melkite usage of the term).

We know this cannot be of God since God commands us not to Kill, for this is against the 5th commandment in which is a article of faith and necessary to obey for salvation. Since God does not contradict Himself and make up false doctrines that contradict His nature, such as Jesus supposedly not being God according to Islam: the question is how can we tolerate this false religion? 

In reality, we cannot. This is why we cannot accept the false doctrine of religious liberty, a innovative teaching that many clergymen teach today even though it contradicts dogma and was condemned by the Infallible Magisterium countless times. 

 
For example, Pope Gregory XVI on May 8th, 1844 states the following in his encyclical Inter Praecipuas:

“Experience shows that there is no more direct way of alienating the populace fromfidelity and obedience to their leaders than through that indifference to religionpropagated by the sect members under the name of religious liberty.”

It is a dogma of the faith that indifferentism is a heresy. This is the teaching that all religions are equal and that we must “co exist” since all religions lead to salvation, a infamous teaching especially taught by the Freemasons and Unitarians. 

Pope Gregory XVI condemns this also in Mirari Vos on August 15, 1832:

“Now We consider another abundant source of the evils with which the Church is afflicted at present: indifferentism. This perverse opinion is spread on all sides by the fraud of the wicked who claim that it is possible to obtain the eternal salvation of the soul by the profession of any kind of religion, as long as morality is maintained. 

Surely, in so clear a matter, you will drive this deadly error far from the people committed to your care. With the admonition of the apostle that “there is one God, one faith, one baptism” may those fear who contrive the notion that the safe harbor of salvation is open to persons of any religion whatever. 

They should consider the testimony of Christ Himself that “those who are not with Christ are against Him,” and that they disperse unhappily who do not gather with Him. Therefore “without a doubt, they will perish forever, unless they hold the Catholic faith whole and inviolate.” Let them hear Jerome who, while the Church was torn into three parts by schism, tells us that whenever someone tried to persuade him to join his group he always exclaimed: “He who is for the See of Peter is for me.”

“A schismatic flatters himself falsely if he asserts that he, too, has been washed in the waters of regeneration. Indeed Augustine would reply to such a man: “The branch has the same form when it has been cut off from the vine; but of what profit for it is the form, if it does not live from the root?”

It is because of the immoral behavior and false teachings of innovative and infamous men that we cannot tolerate false religion, for nobody has the right to profess heresy, blaspheme God, and worship a false one;For there is only One God, The Blessed Trinity: Father, Son, and The Holy Ghost.

 

St Athanasius of Alexandria – Born: 296 AD, Alexandria, Egypt Died: May 2, 373 AD, Alexandria, Egypt


 The ancient Creed of Athanasius states:
“Whoever wishes to be saved must, above all, keep the Catholic faith.For unless a person keeps this faith whole and entire, he will undoubtedly be lost forever.This is what the Catholic faith teaches: we worship one God in the Trinity and the Trinity in unity.”
It is because that Islam rejects this, with many other doctrines, that it is a false religion. This is why, my dear family in Christ, we cannot accept this notion that all religions lead to God. This is why ecumenism is heresy, for it “uncrowns” Christ the King and The True God. 

So how do we combat Islam in our times? How do we combat heresy? Our Lady has made this known to Saint Dominic that she is the hammer of Heresy. This is why we must say The Rosary, for it is by prayer that demons flee, especially when we call upon her name and God’s Holy Name. Wear your brown scapulars, stay close to the sacraments, and remain in the state of grace. It’s time to suit up. 

3 Comments

Filed under Catholic Truth, Christ reigns forever, Consecrate Russia, Devotion to Christ, Dogma, Early church fathers, Encyclical, False religion, Heresy, Heretics, Saints, Salvation, Schismatics, The Crises after Vatican II, The Devil

The Novus Ordo, Americanism, and The Council of Trent

IMG_9625-1

Before I am labeled as a “Schismatic, Pharisee, a know it all, a sedevacantist etc.” as I was from the Liberals within the Catholic blogosphere and other social media websites I would like to ask you to consider the following questions:

  1. Is the Novus Ordo Mass a rite of the Catholic Church, yes or no?
  2. Did the Pope have the authority to compile a new rite?
  3. Is the Novus Ordo Mass in continuation with Apostolic Tradition?

After reading these three questions in which I have appointed above one may argue ‘yes’ for all three, and that’s fine. However, I would like to ask the fellow reader to consider the following points that I will make by referencing the statements of the Popes (be it infallible or subjective), the Saints, and the canons of the Councils of the Church. So let’s get started!

The Second Vatican Council in the document ‘Sacrosanctum Concilium’ paragraph 1 states the following:“This sacred Council has several aims in view: it desires to impart an ever increasing vigor to the Christian life of the faithful; to adapt more suitably to the needs of our own times those institutions which are subject to change; to foster whatever can promote union among all who believe in Christ; to strengthen whatever can help to call the whole of mankind into the household of the Church. The Council therefore sees particularly cogent reasons for undertaking the reform and promotion of the liturgy.”As we examine this specific canon of Sacrosanctum Concilium we must determine if this is continuing with apostolic Tradition or if it is giving flexibility to the evolution of worship and indifferentism. We sadly would have to assume the latter since not only does this statement state “to adapt more suitably to the needs of our own times” but it continues with “to foster whatever can promote union among all who believe in Christ” following with “The council therefore sees particularly cogent reasons for undertaking the reform and promotion of the liturgy”.

The issue with this is that not only does this insist we change the liturgy in order to get with the times, it insists that we change it in order to “promote union among all who believe in Christ” which is heretical since:

  1. The Catholic Church is the sacrament of unity since She alone is the Kingdom of God upon Earth as a result of being Christ’s Holy Bride.
  2. This insists that we must change the liturgy in order to please heretics, such as the Protestants, in order that they may come into the Church as a result of having a liturgy that suits them;therefore the protestant elements of the Novus Ordo Mass which is identical to a Lutheran Liturgy.

If we as Catholics uphold such an absurd position in which insists that we must change the Church’s liturgy in order to get with the times and to please the Protestants to “promote unity”, then we must argue against the statements of the Pre Vatican 2 Magisterium.

Pope Pius X, Pescendi Dominici Gregis, Excerpt 26:

“To conclude this whole question of faith and its various branches, we have still to consider, Venerable Brethren, what the Modernists have to say about the development of the one and the other. First of all they lay down the general principle that in a living religion everything is subject to change, and must in fact be changed. In this way they pass to what is practically their principal doctrine, namely, evolution. To the laws of evolution everything is subject under penalty of death — dogma, Church, worship (emphasis added), the Books we revere as sacred, even faith itself”.

Pope Leo XIII addressing the Americanism heresy his encyclical Testem Benevolentiae Nostrae:

“The underlying principle of these new opinions is that, in order to more easily attract those who differ from her, the Church should shape her teachings more in accord with the spirit of the age and relax some of her ancient severity and make some concessions to new opinions”.

One may argue that the above quote of Pope Leo XIII is not upon the Liturgy itself, however, is not the liturgy the center of our Catholic faith since it is because of the liturgy (when celebrated validly and in accordance with the rubrics approved by the Church) that the Eucharist becomes the Body and Blood of Our Lord, Jesus Christ, therefore touching upon the dogma of transubstantiation? Does not initiating protestant worship within the liturgy cause innovations and challenges to the real presence, the prayers for the souls in purgatory etc., therefore the removal of prayers within the Novus Ordo rite itself? Is not Saint Thomas Aquinas’ “Lex Oriendi, Lex Credendi” still in effect?

Pope Leo XIII on Christian unity:

“But the true church is one, as by unity of doctrine, so by unity of government, and she is catholic also. Since God has placed the center and foundation of unity in the chair of Blessed Peter, she is rightly called the Roman Church, for “where Peter is, there is the church.” Wherefore, if anybody wishes to be considered a real Catholic, he ought to be able to say from his heart the selfsame words which Jerome addressed to Pope Damasus: “I, acknowledging no other leader than Christ, am bound in fellowship with Your Holiness; that is, with the chair of Peter. I know that the church was built upon him as its rock, and that whosoever gathereth not with you, scattereth.”

Since Protestants do not unite with the Church due to heretical doctrines that were invented by heretical founders, how can we promote such a unity with all “Believers in Christ” if they oppose Dogma? How is it that we can now construct new rites when the Sacred Infallible Councils opposed such an idea?

The Council of Trent in Session 7 Canon 13 states: “If any one saith, that the received and approved rites of the Catholic Church, wont to be used in the solemn administration of the sacraments, may be contemned, or without sin be omitted at pleasure by the ministers, or be changed, by every pastor of the churches, into other new ones; let him be anathema”.

Pope Pius V, the Pope in charge of the council of Trent after the death of Pope Paul III, repeated this in his encyclical Quo Primum:

“We specifically command each and every patriarch, administrator, and all other persons or whatever ecclesiastical dignity they may be, be they even cardinals of the Holy Roman Church, or possessed of any other rank or pre-eminence, and We order them in virtue of holy obedience to chant or to read the Mass according to the rite and manner and norm herewith laid down by Us and, hereafter, to discontinue and completely discard all other rubrics and rites of other missals, however ancient, which they have customarily followed; and they must not in celebrating Mass presume to introduce any ceremonies or recite any prayers other than those contained in this Missal.

Furthermore, by these presents [this law], in virtue of Our Apostolic authority, We grant and concede in perpetuity that, for the chanting or reading of the Mass in any church whatsoever, this Missal is hereafter to be followed absolutely, without any scruple of conscience or fear of incurring any penalty, judgment, or censure, and may freely and lawfully be used. Nor are superiors, administrators, canons, chaplains, and other secular priests, or religious, of whatever title designated, obliged to celebrate the Mass otherwise than as enjoined by Us. We likewise declare and ordain that no one whosoever is forced or coerced to alter this Missal, and that this present document cannot be revoked or modified, but remain always valid and retain its full force notwithstanding the previous constitutions and decrees of the Holy See, as well as any general or special constitutions or edicts of provincial or synodal councils, and notwithstanding the practice and custom of the aforesaid churches, established by long and immemorial prescription – except, however, if more than two hundred years’ standing”. (Note – The Novus Ordo is 46 years old since its 2015)

Pope Paul VI was very familiar with this canon and infallible encyclical. This is why on April 3,1969 he stated  “The Missale Romanum was promulgated in 1570 by our predecessor St. Pius V, in execution of the decree of the Council of Trent”: therefore the exact reason why he did not codify it for the Church since he knew that he would put himself in ipso facto schism.

Since this is binding for all time upon pastors, including the Pope since he is a pastor of the Church as the Vicar of Christ, Primate of Italy, the Patriarch of the West, and visible head of the Church, how can we conclude that the novus ordo mass is from the Church herself when it was constructed by 6 protestant ministers and the proven to be freemason, Archbishop Bugini, who repeated that it was his intention to remove the prayers of the Church in order to please the protestants? He insisted that “We must strip from our Catholic prayers and from the Catholic liturgy everything which can be the shadow of a stumbling block for our separated brethren that is for the Prostestants.” – Archbishop Annibale Bugnini, main author of the New Mass, L’Osservatore Romano, March 19, 1969

Jimmy Papist Moment –‘But Didn’t Pope Paul VI suggest that Latin be used?

IMG_9150

I think you are over reacting!’Actually, Jimmy, he said the contrary to the general audience on November 26, 1969 when he said “It is here that the greatest newness is going to be noticed, the newness of language. No longer Latin, but the spoken language will be the principal language of the Mass. The introduction of the vernacular will certainly be a great sacrifice for those who know the beauty, the power and the expressive sacrality of Latin”

Leave a comment

Filed under Councils, Encyclical, liturgy, Novus Ordo, vatican ii

Americanism and the Masons 

The following link in which leads to a sermon from the FSSP is upon the foundation of America upon the Luciferian group, the Freemasons.

  

Leave a comment

Filed under Encyclical, Freemasons, Pictures

In Eminenti and the Freemasons 

  
” Wherefore We command most strictly and in virtue of holy obedience, all the faithful of whatever state, grade, condition, order, dignity or pre-eminence, whether clerical or lay, secular or regular, even those who are entitled to specific and individual mention, that none, under any pretext or for any reason, shall dare or presume to enter, propagate or support these aforesaid societies of Liberi Muratori or Francs Massons, or however else they are called, or to receive them in their houses or dwellings or to hide them, be enrolled among them, joined to them, be present with them, give power or permission for them to meet elsewhere, to help them in any way, to give them in any way advice, encouragement or support either openly or in secret, directly or indirectly, on their own or through others; nor are they to urge others or tell them, incite or persuade them to be enrolled in such societies or to be counted among their number, or to be present or to assist them in any way; but they must stay completely clear of such Societies, Companies, Assemblies, Meetings, Congregations or Conventicles, under pain of excommunication for all the above mentioned people, which is incurred by the very deed without any declaration being required, and from which no one can obtain the benefit of absolution, other than at the hour of death, except through Ourselves or the Roman Pontiff of the time.”

The secret societies, such as the Freemasons, Skulls and Bones, Illumanati etc. are to be avoided at all costs. The Church has condemned the societies infallibly due to the fact that these societies engage in activity in which involve persecuting the Church through plot, spreading errors of modernism, practicing the rituals of the occult, and revolution against Catholic Truth, as we have seen in France, 1789–1799. 

If any Catholic, whether laymen, religious, clergymen etc. joins or associates with any of the above listed organizations, or anything similar, then according to the 1917 Code of Canon law you are automatically excommunicated from the Holy Roman Catholic Church. 

Canon 2335: “Those who join a Masonic sect or other societies of the same sort, which plot against the Church or against legitimate civil authority, incur ipso facto an excommunication simply reserved to the Holy See”. If anybody is a member of the Freemasons or any similar organization, for the salvation of your soul, repent and leave this organization now. 

 

2 Comments

Filed under Canon Law, Encyclical, Excommunication, Freemasons, Repent, Salvation

My commentary on the recent encyclical of Pope Francis

  
After reading the encyclical titled  ‘Laudato SI’  that was recently released, I found many statements within the document to be quite questionable.

I honestly believe along with Catholic journalist, Michael Matt from ‘The Remnant’, that our Holy Father, Pope Francis, is possibly under control from enemies of the Church within the UN as he stated Here, although I would also argue that the masons are just as much responsible, however, that’s a topic for another day. The disturbing quotations from the encyclical, along with my commentary, list as follows:

  • Section 63: Respect must also be shown for the various cultural riches of different peoples, their art and poetry, their interior life and spirituality. If we are truly concerned to develop an ecology capable of remedying the damage we have done, no branch of the sciences and no form of wisdom can be left out, and that includes religion and the language particular to it. The Catholic Church is open to dialogue with philosophical thought; this has enabled her to produce various syntheses between faith and reason. The development of the Church’s social teaching represents such a synthesis with regard to social issues; this teaching is called to be enriched by taking up new challenges.

Excuse me if I am misinterpreting this, but is our beloved Pope suggesting that we respect the false religions of various nations such as Buddhism, modern Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, and Wicca that reject the basic dogmas of the Holy Catholic faith? Are we to respect pagan religions that worship deities of the underworld such as Buddhism, Hinduism, and Wicca that outright blaspheme our Lord? Respect for the individual human being is one thing since we are to respect the dignity of each and every single person since we are all made in the image of God, however, respecting a religion that flat out rejects Christ whom is the way, truth, and the life is objectively speaking border line apostasy since it can initiate indifferentism as we have seen at Assisi under the authority of Pope John Paul II, which later resulted in Buddhist worship within a Catholic chapel of Assisi along with placing a statue of the false prophet Buddha above the Tabernacle in which Our Lord was present.

Buddhists bowing to statue of the false prophet Buddha that was placed above the tabernacle within Saint Peter’s Chapel in Assissi, 1986

Are we not, by the virtue of our baptism, obliged to share the Gospel with those in false religions so that we can lead them to the truth for the salvation of their souls? Was not indifferentism previously condemned by the Church in Her 2000 years of tradition and the infallible councils? What about the encyclical of Pope Gregory the 15th titled ‘Mirari Vos’ that was released on August 15,1832 which states the following:

“Now We consider another abundant source of the evils with which the Church is afflicted at present: indifferentism. This perverse opinion is spread on all sides by the fraud of the wicked who claim that it is possible to obtain the eternal salvation of the soul by the profession of any kind of religion, as long as morality is maintained. Surely, in so clear a matter, you will drive this deadly error far from the people committed to your care. With the admonition of the apostle that “there is one God, one faith, one baptism”may those fear who contrive the notion that the safe harbor of salvation is open to persons of any religion whatever. They should consider the testimony of Christ Himself that “those who are not with Christ are against Him,” and that they disperse unhappily who do not gather with Him. Therefore “without a doubt, they will perish forever, unless they hold the Catholic faith whole and inviolate.” Let them hear Jerome who, while the Church was torn into three parts by schism, tells us that whenever someone tried to persuade him to join his group he always exclaimed: “He who is for the See of Peter is for me.”A schismatic flatters himself falsely if he asserts that he, too, has been washed in the waters of regeneration. Indeed Augustine would reply to such a man: “The branch has the same form when it has been cut off from the vine; but of what profit for it is the form, if it does not live from the root?”

  • Section 64. “Furthermore, although this Encyclical welcomes dialogue with everyone so that together we can seek paths of liberation, I would like from the outset to show how faith convictions can offer Christians, and some other believers as well, ample motivation to care for nature and for the most vulnerable of their brothers and sisters. If the simple fact of being human moves people to care for the environment of which they are a part, Christians in their turn “realize that their responsibility within creation, and their duty towards nature and the Creator, are an essential part of their faith”. It is good for humanity and the world at large when we believers better recognize the ecological commitments which stem from our convictions.”

The reason I find this to be quite questionable is because it seems that our beloved Pope intends to promote flexibility of theology and ideas from those outside of the Church in regards to how we solve the issues we are now facing in the world, thus “dialogue with everyone so that together we can seek paths of liberation”. Continuing..

  • Section 67: “Although it is true that we Christians have at times incorrectly interpreted the Scriptures, nowadays we must forcefully reject the notion that our being created in God’s image and given dominion over the earth justifies absolute domination over other creatures.”

While it is true that those who identify as Christians have misinterpreted scripture, is the Holy Father also suggesting that the Church has misinterpreted scripture these past 2000 years, especially when it comes to the “symbolic and narrative language” as stated in section 66? Continuing..

  • Section 216: The rich heritage of Christian spirituality, the fruit of twenty centuries of personal and communal experience, has a precious contribution to make to the renewal of humanity. Here, I would like to offer Christians a few suggestions for an ecological spirituality grounded in the convictions of our faith, since the teachings of the Gospel have direct consequences for our way of thinking, feeling and living. More than in ideas or concepts as such, I am interested in how such a spirituality can motivate us to a more passionate concern for the protection of our world. A commitment this lofty cannot be sustained by doctrine alone, without a spirituality capable of inspiring us, without an “interior impulse which encourages, motivates, nourishes and gives meaning to our individual and communal activity”.

Is neo pagan ecological spirituality now bound upon the faithful, Holy Father since section 15 states “It is my hope that this Encyclical Letter, which is now added to the body of the Church’s social teaching, can help us to acknowledge the appeal, immensity and urgency of the challenge we face”? Wouldn’t this be apostasy?

  • Section 222: “Christian spirituality proposes an alternative understanding of the quality of life, and encourages a prophetic and contemplative lifestyle, one capable of deep enjoyment free of the obsession with consumption. We need to take up an ancient lesson, found in different religious traditions and also in the Bible.”

This quotation explains itself clearly.. This is blasphemy and heresy. Suggesting that we take up ancient lessons of false religions, such as the Quran which outright rejects the Blessed Trinity, Baptism, the Divinity of Our Lord, Jesus Christ etc. – is something the Saints of the Church would condemn.

Any cult which denies the divinity of Christ, does not profess the existence of the Holy Trinity, refutes baptism, defames Christians, and derogates the priesthood, we consider to be damned.” -Sts. Aurelius, Felix, George, Liliosa, and Natalia (d. 852), martyrs of Cordoba, Spain. Reported in the Memoriale Sanctorum in response to Spanish Umayyad Caliph ‘Abd Ar-Rahman II’s ministers that they convert to Islam on pain of death.

  • 236: “Indeed the Eucharist is itself an act of cosmic love: “Yes, cosmic! Because even when it is celebrated on the humble altar of a country church, the Eucharist is always in some way celebrated on the altar of the world”.

What is this altar of the world if the prince of this world is satan?..

  • Section 246: At the conclusion of this lengthy reflection which has been both joyful and troubling, I propose that we offer two prayers. The first we can share with all who believe in a God who is the all-powerful Creator, while in the other we Christians ask for inspiration to take up the commitment to creation set before us by the Gospel of Jesus.

Holy Father, are we to pray with those who do not accept the basic Christian faith? Are we to pray with pagans who worship demons, muslims and jews who reject the messiah, and heretics who reject the Catholic faith? What about Pope Saint. Agatho I, your successor, whom stated “If anyone prays with heretics, he is a heretic” which he stated in the 7th century? Is this now out dated theology, thus Church teachings can develop and change along with Dogma that was condemned by Pope Pius X, or is this still the case?
Continue to pray for the Holy Father, my fellow crusaders. 

Leave a comment

Filed under Encyclical, modernism, Pope Francis, Spirit of vatican 2, vatican ii