Category Archives: Early church fathers

False religion, religious liberty, Islam, and Catholic combat. 

Blessed First Friday my dear brothers and sisters in Christ. It has been a month since I have posted since it’s very important to give time to God and the duties He gives you in life. I want to thank everyone for their prayers and support. 

Now let’s cut to the chase. While I was gone we have witnessed chaotic events that have taken place in this world corrupted by sin. From heresy coming from the Hiearchy of Holy Mother Church, to the shootings that slaughtered innocent people, to the construction of satanic temples here in the USA, I would like to emphasize the bombings in Paris from those who practice the demonicly inspired religion of Islam founded by the false prophet Mohammad. 

From what I recall, 60 lives were taken as a result of Islamic attacks upon innocent people. These attacks are done to give praise to the false god “allah” (not to be mistaken with the true Allah, The Blessed Trinity, since Allah translates to God in Arabic, hence the Melkite usage of the term).

We know this cannot be of God since God commands us not to Kill, for this is against the 5th commandment in which is a article of faith and necessary to obey for salvation. Since God does not contradict Himself and make up false doctrines that contradict His nature, such as Jesus supposedly not being God according to Islam: the question is how can we tolerate this false religion? 

In reality, we cannot. This is why we cannot accept the false doctrine of religious liberty, a innovative teaching that many clergymen teach today even though it contradicts dogma and was condemned by the Infallible Magisterium countless times. 

 
For example, Pope Gregory XVI on May 8th, 1844 states the following in his encyclical Inter Praecipuas:

“Experience shows that there is no more direct way of alienating the populace fromfidelity and obedience to their leaders than through that indifference to religionpropagated by the sect members under the name of religious liberty.”

It is a dogma of the faith that indifferentism is a heresy. This is the teaching that all religions are equal and that we must “co exist” since all religions lead to salvation, a infamous teaching especially taught by the Freemasons and Unitarians. 

Pope Gregory XVI condemns this also in Mirari Vos on August 15, 1832:

“Now We consider another abundant source of the evils with which the Church is afflicted at present: indifferentism. This perverse opinion is spread on all sides by the fraud of the wicked who claim that it is possible to obtain the eternal salvation of the soul by the profession of any kind of religion, as long as morality is maintained. 

Surely, in so clear a matter, you will drive this deadly error far from the people committed to your care. With the admonition of the apostle that “there is one God, one faith, one baptism” may those fear who contrive the notion that the safe harbor of salvation is open to persons of any religion whatever. 

They should consider the testimony of Christ Himself that “those who are not with Christ are against Him,” and that they disperse unhappily who do not gather with Him. Therefore “without a doubt, they will perish forever, unless they hold the Catholic faith whole and inviolate.” Let them hear Jerome who, while the Church was torn into three parts by schism, tells us that whenever someone tried to persuade him to join his group he always exclaimed: “He who is for the See of Peter is for me.”

“A schismatic flatters himself falsely if he asserts that he, too, has been washed in the waters of regeneration. Indeed Augustine would reply to such a man: “The branch has the same form when it has been cut off from the vine; but of what profit for it is the form, if it does not live from the root?”

It is because of the immoral behavior and false teachings of innovative and infamous men that we cannot tolerate false religion, for nobody has the right to profess heresy, blaspheme God, and worship a false one;For there is only One God, The Blessed Trinity: Father, Son, and The Holy Ghost.

 

St Athanasius of Alexandria – Born: 296 AD, Alexandria, Egypt Died: May 2, 373 AD, Alexandria, Egypt


 The ancient Creed of Athanasius states:
“Whoever wishes to be saved must, above all, keep the Catholic faith.For unless a person keeps this faith whole and entire, he will undoubtedly be lost forever.This is what the Catholic faith teaches: we worship one God in the Trinity and the Trinity in unity.”
It is because that Islam rejects this, with many other doctrines, that it is a false religion. This is why, my dear family in Christ, we cannot accept this notion that all religions lead to God. This is why ecumenism is heresy, for it “uncrowns” Christ the King and The True God. 

So how do we combat Islam in our times? How do we combat heresy? Our Lady has made this known to Saint Dominic that she is the hammer of Heresy. This is why we must say The Rosary, for it is by prayer that demons flee, especially when we call upon her name and God’s Holy Name. Wear your brown scapulars, stay close to the sacraments, and remain in the state of grace. It’s time to suit up. 

Advertisements

3 Comments

Filed under Catholic Truth, Christ reigns forever, Consecrate Russia, Devotion to Christ, Dogma, Early church fathers, Encyclical, False religion, Heresy, Heretics, Saints, Salvation, Schismatics, The Crises after Vatican II, The Devil

Why Traditionalists object to a new liturgy: Dogma. 

 
Not only is Catholic doctrine and dogma handed down through Scripture, it is handed down by Sacred Tradition as well. Objectively speaking, the ancient and Apostolic liturgies celebrated and handed down by the early church are apart of Sacred Tradition since it expresses what the Church believes, as Saint Basil explains. This is the very reason why we Catholics who uphold Tradition are very strict when it comes to properly celebrating the liturgy, simply because we wouldn’t want souls to be harmed by innovation and blasphemy. But then again, what good Catholic would?

When the Protestant heresy was spreading throughout the West in the 16th century after Martin Luther and other Protestant theologians and founders were in protest against Catholic doctrine and Dogma, the Church has responded with a Ecumenical Council called the Council of Trent. At this council the heresies of Protestantism were condemned since they are heretical in their nature and both contradict and challenge Church teaching. 

At this Sacred Council inspired by The Holy Ghost, Third Person of the Most Holy Trinity, Pope Pius V – who headed the council after Pope Paul III of good memory passed away – infallibly ordered that new liturgies cannot be constructed for the very reason that heresies, abuses, blasphemies, and innovations are within them and will only destroy the faith of many. As Saint Thomas Aquinas has stated: The Law of Prayer is the Law of belief, or the way we pray is the way we believe: Lex Oriendi, Lex Credendi. 

Granted, it explains why we Roman Catholics that are faithful to the magisterium object to the illicit construction of a new liturgy that was released after the Second Vatican Council: that being the Novus Ordo Mass. It is a fact, and yes I have proof, that the constructors of the Novus Ordo mass were 6 Protestant Ministers and a excommunicated Freemason (since affiliation with the Masonic sect is a automatic excommunication), that being Archbishop Bugini, or as the Masons called him: Brother Buan. 

He himself has made it known in his own writings that his intention was to create a new liturgy that would be pleasing to those within the Protestant congregations so that we may not cause a division. 
“We must strip from our Catholic prayers and from the Catholic liturgy everything which can be the shadow of a stumbling block for our separated brethren that is for the Prostestants.” – Archbishop Annibale Bugnini, main author of the New Mass, L’Osservatore Romano, March 19, 1965
Some would ask: “Wouldn’t making a liturgy that we can all agree upon only unite all Christians? Isn’t this a good thing and will only help build bridges and convert people back to the church?” 

While it is good that there is the intention to convert non Catholics for the salvation of their soul, it is impossible to make a liturgy that would be pleasing to all religions simply because we all uphold different beliefs, ours being orthodox while non Catholics are heterodox and heretical. If we would make a “ecumenical liturgy”, we would have to depart from Sacred Tradition and remove Catholic identity, but even worse, Catholic doctrine and dogma itself. 

Since Jesus founded the Roman Catholic Church in which teaches His Truth (1 Cor 3:15), The Church cannot ever change Her Teachings since Christ’s teachings doesn’t change for the very fact that He is Truth Himself. If truth were to “evolve” as the modernists suggests, that would mean that Christ is a liar which is only blasphemy. But we as Catholics know this isn’t true since Christ’s Words will never pass away. “Heaven and earth shall pass, but my words shall not pass.” (Matt 24:35)

Plus, to water down the faith in order to ‘convert’ those outside the Church would never be a true conversion since they would still uphold their heterodox beliefs and practices. The watering down of the faith to be more appealing to non Catholics for ‘conversion’ is a error that Pope Leo XIII has condemned: that being the heresy of Americanism. 

So where does this leave us? It shows that we as the Church Militant are in a crises worse than we have ever seen before. But we must have Hope and trust in Our Lady, for Her Immaculate Heart will triumph as She has promised at Fatima in 1917 since She has warned in the Third Secret that a great apostasy will come from the Top, therefore the crises of faith after Vatican 2. So what do we do? We pray, Hope, and don’t worry as Padre Pio recommended. We stick to Tradition. We pray and work towards Catholic restoration. We combat heresy. We stay in the state of grace. We educate ourselves in the faith. We pray and work towards the restoration of the true Mass within the Roman Rite parishes, that being the Traditional Latin Mass (heck even the Ambrosian and Mozarabic since Trent accepted them!) 

Leave a comment

Filed under Dogma, Early church fathers, History, Latin Mass, liturgy, Saints, Schismatics

Homosexuality and Morris M vs the Early Church Fathers

 
 In today’s society not only is the heresy of Sola scriptura embraced within Protestant circles, but we are now seeing it among the sodomite LGBT communities. From Genesis 2:24 and Ruth 1:14 in which “Ruth loved Noami as Adam loved Eve” (supposedly supporting same sex relationships), to 2 Samuel 1:26 “David loving Jonathan more than women”, to Matthew 19:10-12 supposedly saying that Jesus spoke of gays being born the way they are; these are all false interpretations and therefore, heretical. Since scripture, in which is inspired by the Holy Ghost, instructs that marriage is between a man and a woman alone (Genesis 1:27-28, Genesis 2:24, Ephesians 5:23,24,32, Matthew 19:4-6 etc) how can we conclude with some erroneous and blasphemous opinions in which suggest that God can supposedly change His mind and Will or contradict Himself as if He were imperfect, therefore a mortal and not a Supreme Being? 

The Homosexual supporters, such as Mr. Morris M, would also comment upon the story of Sodom and Gomorrah with absurd statements as the following:

“The story of Sodom and Gomorrah has been used to justify homophobia for centuries… it’s brought up anytime someone mentions gay rights as way of showing just how much God hates homosexuals. Too bad then that other parts of the Bible specifically state the Sodomites were firebombed for being arrogant rich windbags who hated the poor. God never actually states why he’s blowing up thousands of people; but the last act of the Sodomites before their fiery death is to try and rape three male angels, so the assumption is that homosexuality is the trigger. At least, it is if you’ve never bothered to read the rest of the Bible”. Source: Link

Since interpretation of scripture is becoming a issue with not only Protestants, but LGBT supporters, let us turn to the commentary of the Early Church Fathers, whom were disciples of the apostles, upon this key issue in which the bible supposedly does not touch upon the sin of sodomacy. In fact,let’s initiate the statements of the Early Church Fathers with scripture itself. 

Jude 1: 7: “Just as Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding cities, which likewise acted immorally and indulged in unnatural lust, serve as an example by undergoing a punishment of eternal fire”

 Pope Saint Gregory the Great, a early church father and doctor of the Church, repeats this in his own writings which state the following: 

“Sacred Scripture itself confirms that sulfur evokes the stench of the flesh, as it speaks of the rain of fire and sulfur poured upon Sodom by the Lord. He had decided to punish Sodom for the crimes of the flesh, and the very type of punishment he chose emphasized the shame of that crime. For sulfur stinks, and fire burns. So it was just that Sodomites, burning with perverse desires arising from the flesh like stench, should perish by fire and sulfur so that through this just punishment they would realize the evil they had committed, led by a perverse desire.” 

If Morris M was right upon his statement in which he said “other parts of the Bible specifically state the Sodomites were firebombed for being arrogant rich windbags who hated the poor.” then he must explain why Jude 1:7 argues otherwise when it states “immorally and indulged in unnatural lust, serve as an example by undergoing a punishment of eternal fire” as Saint Gregory simply repeated.Could it be that he is falling into the trap of hypocrisy in which he himself states “At least, it is if you’ve never bothered to read the rest of the Bible”. I would assume this is the case or he is being totally dishonest. 

He must argue why St. John Chrysostom, (347 – 407) whom was the greatest of the Greek Fathers (the original bible was written in Greek) a proclaimed Doctor of the Church, Archbishop and Patriarch of Constantinople was wrong when he, a expert on scripture and the doctrine of the apostles, stated the following: 
“Consider how great is that sin, to have forced hell to appear even before its time!… For that rain was unwonted, for the intercourse was contrary to nature, and it deluged the land, since lust had done so with their souls. Wherefore also the rain was the opposite of the customary rain. Now not only did it fail to stir up the womb of the earth to the production of fruits, but made it even useless for the reception of seed. For such was also the intercourse of the men, making a body of this sort more worthless than the very land of Sodom. And what is there more detestable than a man who hath pandered himself, or what more execrable?”

Could it be that the Holy Ghost in which Inspired the infallible scriptures and the Church was wrong all along? Could it be that the Holy Ghost failed the Church these past 2000 years until the infallible Mr.Morris came to be? We know the answer here and objectively speaking this is not the case. 

Saint Augustine – “Those offences which be contrary to nature are everywhere and at all times to be held in detestation and punished; such were those of the Sodomites, which should all nations commit, they should all be held guilty of the same crime by the divine law, which hath not so made men that they should in that way abuse one another. For even that fellowship which should be between God and us is violated, when that same nature of which He is author is polluted by the perversity of lust.”

Eusebius Pamphili (260 – 341), Bishop of Cæsarea in Palestine and the “Father of Church History,” writes in his book, Demonstratio Evangelica: 

“[God in the Law given to Moses] having forbidden all unlawful marriage, and all unseemly practice, and the union of women with women and men with men.”

Therefore, how can we say that Homosexuality is justified by God when it contradicts His own instructions and doctrine given to the infallible Church? Mr.Morris must either admit that he was wrong and dishonest or explain why his man made heathen doctrine is infallible and above God’s instructions. Since this is impossible, we can conclude that false interpretations of scripture are still in effect, even by non Christians, as the infidel Mr.Morris.

Leave a comment

Filed under Bible, Early church fathers, Heresy, Homosexuality, modernism, Sola scriptura